https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #4) > But LLVM doesn't support shared UBSan runtime (the only one supported is > ASan) and AFAIK there aren't any plans to support it there. Yeah, it is a very weird policy. > > In any case, we shouldn't be making ABI incompatible changes in the > > libraries. So, either we should bump soname, or preferably, if it is not > > that hard to readd those symbols, just do that, so that people don't have to > > fight yet another changed library. > > Do you mean we can apply a local patch? We can, sure.
