http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54947
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-07
12:29:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I think it is unambiguous, as for designated initializer there needs to be =
> after ],
Ah yes, that's true.
> while for lambda {, right?
Or ( for a parameter list, e.g. [](int i) { return i; }
But you're right, it shouldn't be ambiguous.
