http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54947
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-11-07
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-07
10:01:02 UTC ---
Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176530
This clashes with the C99 designated initializers (as GNU extension for C++).
Guess perhaps the designated array initializers need to be parsed tentatively
for C++11, and if they aren't valid, we'd retry as lambdas.
It seems that C++ only supports the C99 style array designators ([constant] =
something) which aren't ambiguous with lambdas (unlike the old [constant]
something), are they?
Note that
constexpr int i = 0;
int a[] = { [i] = 0 };
ICEs currently with -std=gnu++11.
