http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54947
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-07 12:15:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Guess perhaps the designated array initializers need to be parsed tentatively > for C++11, and if they aren't valid, we'd retry as lambdas. Shouldn't we try as lambdas, and if not valid retry as non-standard designated initializers? If it's ambiguous we should assume it's a standard C+ not the extension.
