http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54594
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-16 22:06:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Error: Type-bound operator at (1) can't be NOPASS
>
> Is it expected?
After this is settled (the answer being yes), I'll close this PR, since the
original problem was fixed with r191365.
