[Bug fortran/54594] [OOP] Type-bound ASSIGNMENTs (elemental + array version) rejected as ambiguous

[janus at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54594

--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-16 21:38:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> The constraint is (F2008):
> 
> C468 (R450) If generic-spec is not generic-name, each of its specific bindings
> shall have a passed-object dummy argument (4.5.4.5).
> 
> with
> 
> R1207 generic-spec  is  generic-name
>                     or  OPERATOR ( dened-operator )
>                     or  ASSIGNMENT ( = )
>                     or  defined-io-generic-spec

Thanks for finding the reference. I looked in the right spot, but somehow
overread it, due to the 'indirect' wording.

I will commit the following docu-patch as obvious:

Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c       (revision 191364)
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c       (working copy)
@@ -11429,7 +11429,7 @@
   target_proc = target->specific->u.specific->n.sym;
   gcc_assert (target_proc);

-  /* All operator bindings must have a passed-object dummy argument.  */
+  /* F08:C468. All operator bindings must have a passed-object dummy argument.
 */
   if (target->specific->nopass)
     {
       gfc_error ("Type-bound operator at %L can't be NOPASS", &where);