http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54594
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-16
21:25:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > Is it expected?
(Both the original example and the one of comment 1 do compile and run with
crayftn.)
> That's a good question. I could not find that restriction in the standard on a
> quick check. In any case, the error message comes from
> 'get_checked_tb_operator_target' (resolve.c), which was committed in r150856
That's PR 37425 (you had one digit wrong).
The constraint is (F2008):
C468 (R450) If generic-spec is not generic-name, each of its specific bindings
shall have a passed-object dummy argument (4.5.4.5).
with
R1207 generic-spec is generic-name
or OPERATOR ( de ned-operator )
or ASSIGNMENT ( = )
or defined-io-generic-spec
