http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50088
--- Comment #13 from Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com> 2011-08-17 09:07:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Created attachment 25025 [details] > A patch to use the same mode for shift count > > This is an untested patch to use the same mode for shift count. We should find solution for the general problem. Not for its specific appearance in reproducer. We may have the same issue for any other instructions consuming byte register and it is better to fix the source of the problem (which is I suppose in IRA) and do not introduce workaround for each such instruction. BTW I think you should not increase size of immediate operands in your patch.
