------- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 20:12 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) ....snip.... > I suspect that it is similar but not identical. Will look after dinner :-) > > Paul >
This surmise is correct. As soon as the other two fixes have finished regtesting, I will try what I think is the fix for this one. I believe the derived type 'dt' at trans-expr.c:507 needs to be checked for its backend_decl. Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43043
