------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 18:41 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > The following fixes the PR. I have not regtested yet but anticipate that all > will be well.
Looks good. Does is also fix PR 43039? Looking at Thomas' analysis and at the patch, it might well be the case. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43043
