------- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 19:09 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > The following fixes the PR. I have not regtested yet but anticipate that > > all > > will be well. > > Looks good. Does is also fix PR 43039? Looking at Thomas' analysis and at the > patch, it might well be the case. >
I suspect that it is similar but not identical. Will look after dinner :-) Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43043
