------- Comment #20 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-12 10:53 ------- (In reply to comment #19) > I think this bug could be closed now, any objections?
Not from me, I agree it can be closed. I'd like only to make sure we don't forget about the issue with pointers to member functions: is there a DR open already? Maybe we could also find a way to mention it in the code, if you haven't done that already, didn't check. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24803