------- Comment #7 from juergen dot reuter at desy dot de 2009-06-18 13:33 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5)
The crucial part is that the return value is a pointer! If I > > Yeeees.... there is a bug there somewhere. I shall have to think this through. > I am not sure that your testcase should be allowed at all! I am not sure that > I understand what it means. > > Paul Dear Paul, if you need any help please let me know. It might also be possible that we wrote some code contradicting conventions, which would be valuable to know. I'm still convinced that this is a problem of the compiler, since it works with the NAG and Intel compilers. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40440
