------- Comment #18 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-11 16:46 ------- (In reply to comment #17) > In any case, I don't really understand your snippet: you are comparing &x.i to > &t1.i, but x comes from p, and p *copies* t1 at construction time, in other > terms &p.first.i != &t1.i to begin with. >
You are right. My testcase is wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37144
