------- Comment #17 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-12-11 16:39 ------- In any case, I don't really understand your snippet: you are comparing &x.i to &t1.i, but x comes from p, and p *copies* t1 at construction time, in other terms &p.first.i != &t1.i to begin with.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37144
