------- Comment #20 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-01 21:53 ------- (In reply to comment #19) > I don't see the "Are we lucky and avoid syscall?" hack in the fd_seek > routine from unix.c of the gcc 4.0 branch. So one could argue that it was a > performance regression introduced in gcc 4.1.
Let's fix the problem first, without introducing any new regressions, and then worry about backporting :-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33985
