------- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-12-08 00:20 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > FWIW, I think Andrew makes a good point in comment #1. The algorithms really > should return the iterator, otherwise the caller may not be able to find out > the state of the iterator after the algorithm returns (e.g., when the iterator > is ostreambuf_iterator).
Ah, I see. Then the issue is more subtle than uninitialized_fill_n in 16505... > It may not be a bad idea to open an issue (or at least > bring it up on the reflector). Ok, I will, if you don't beat me ;) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25304
