------- Comment #18 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-01-04 13:58 ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Not that > I'm > saying that means the code should stay, just at least one data point of > someone > who is using the current version :)
Thanks. By now, I think we agree that first we want to raise the issue with the LWG. I promise to do something in time for Berlin, at least. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25304