------- Comment #18 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2006-01-04 13:58 -------
(In reply to comment #17)
>                                                                    Not that 
> I'm
> saying that means the code should stay, just at least one data point of 
> someone
> who is using the current version :)

Thanks. By now, I think we agree that first we want to raise the issue with the
LWG. I promise to do something in time for Berlin, at least.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25304


Reply via email to