------- Comment #14 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-12-08 16:23 ------- Subject: Re: std::fill_n, std::generate_n incorrect signature
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | 2- As I see the issue, it depends a lot on the actual timeframe of | the possible enhancement to the standard. I mean, if we are thinking | about C++0x, seems rather far in time. I think most of our users | would not perceive our practice as randomly going back and forward | on something. Fair enough. (At Lillehammer, we set to have x, in C++0x, a digit; so that means we're almost done by 2007. That is not far, given that LWG would not need to wait 2007 before agreeing on the issue. I was amazed to discover that CWG two two meetings to open an issue and move it to WP. LWG could do the same. Hint, hint, :-)) -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25304
