> > errors). Thus LFN support should not be mandatory, in fact we > > may want to offer support for it as a second binary (eg tree v3.x > > is intended for older systems or spaced limited ones, whereas > > pdtree (tree v4.x) supports LFNs (and additional items on NT systems > > such as indicating SPARSE files or displaying alternate streams). > > I agree entirely too. > > (Well, personally I would not be happy with LFN being mandatory, it'd > force me to entirely write LFN for Pascal, or see how FPC's LFN can be > compiled for TP, as the KEYB non-resident code is, for the moment, > written in Pascal, the only inheritance remaining from the xkeyb days).
I found some public domain LFN units here: http://www.darklogic.org/fdos/mirrors/tpllfn/tpllfnpd.txt ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
