Dmitry Marakasov píše v st 25. 03. 2009 v 19:36 +0300: > * Pav Lucistnik ([email protected]) wrote: > > Great, that was just about time. > > My question is whenther that would be enabled on pointyhat. I fear > that error logs may become far less readable with output from > multiple commands mixed together.
pointyhat observes the same rules and conditions as the end user, for obvious reasons. So ports marked 'safe' will be parallelized, others will not. -- Pav Lucistnik <[email protected]> <[email protected]> It's the classic Microsoft security-bulletin formula: "The vulnerability is important (never dangerous); you have nothing to fear and no reason to regret trusting us; we have no intention of apologizing for it or even explaining it adequately; now go get your patch, shut up, and be grateful nothing bad has happened. -- The Register
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
