In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter Wemm writes: : Warner Losh wrote: : significance to the naming at all. The versioning is done at link time : by the libfoo.so -> libfoo.so.N symlink. Ah. That's different. If it is that easy, then my objection is withdrawn. I wasted about 3 days trying to untangle a version downgrade, but now that I think about that was in the 2.x days when we had a.out libs. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad f... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad f... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is ... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... Matt Dillon
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Matt Dillon
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... Jos Backus
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... David O'Brien