"David O'Brien" wrote: > Actually going from libc.so.500 to libc.so.{x<500} is easy. > Copy libc.so.500 into /usr/lib/compat. When the libc.so link is made to > libc.so.{x<500}, that is the lib version number that will get burned into > objects. After the first `make world', rm /usr/lib/libc.so.500. There is no need to rm /usr/lib/libc.so.500 - once a new libc is installed, and the symlink points to it, then libc.so.500 will *never* get linked against. Remember, the number in the filename means *nothing*. There is no less than or greater than relationship. We could use 100 digit random numbers for each bump if we liked. We could use dates, current time_t, anything. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURREN... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CU... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURREN... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CU... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CU... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re... Matt Dillon
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (wa... Matt Dillon
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (wa... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CU... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re... Jos Backus
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for ... Alex Zepeda
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for ... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad... Daniel Eischen