On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 12:58:21PM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote: > I agree that PREFIX/LOCALBASE should work: you can't legislate > taste. I'm going to keep it to /usr/local and /usr/X11R6, > though, thanks all the same. Its been acknowledged that we really should not be installing ports into /usr/X11R6 -- that is for X. But Imake is hard to make it DTRT. :-( -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- [current] Re: Confusing error messages from shell ima... David Gilbert
- Re: [current] Re: Confusing error messages from shell... Michael C . Wu
- Re: [current] Re: Confusing error messages from shell... Brandon D. Valentine
- Re: [current] Re: Confusing error messages from shell... Mike Meyer
- Re: [current] Re: Confusing error messages from shell... Andreas Klemm
- /usr/local vs. /usr/pkg Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Nat Lanza
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Andrew Reilly
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Warner Losh
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Nat Lanza
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Joe Kelsey
- /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse Brian Dean
- Re: /usr/local abuse Blaz Zupan
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Wes Peters
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien