In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Andrew Reilly" writes: : Well, I'll just stick my oar in for /usr/local. I count myself : among the aesthetically dismayed when I first encountered /opt : on a SunOS box. (Or was that Solaris? Time fades...) Solaris 2.x introduced it, but packages that ran on both Solaris 1 (aka SunOS 4.1) and Solaris 2.x tended to want to live in /opt after a while. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: [current] Re: Confusing error messages from shell... Michael C . Wu
- Re: [current] Re: Confusing error messages from shell... Brandon D. Valentine
- Re: [current] Re: Confusing error messages from shell... Mike Meyer
- Re: [current] Re: Confusing error messages from shell... Andreas Klemm
- /usr/local vs. /usr/pkg Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Nat Lanza
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Andrew Reilly
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Warner Losh
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Nat Lanza
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Joe Kelsey
- /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse Brian Dean
- Re: /usr/local abuse Blaz Zupan
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Wes Peters
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey