On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 06:56:13PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > > Do you understand why NetBSD Packages (ie, the system they took from us) > > install into /usr/pkg by default rather than /usr/local ? > > Yes, but that doesn't mean I agree with it. In fact, I find it slighly > bizarre. I dislike needing a different path on NetBSD than what I have > on {Free,Open}BSD. /me hands Wes a single symlink. :-) -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Warner Losh
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Nat Lanza
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Joe Kelsey
- /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse Brian Dean
- Re: /usr/local abuse Blaz Zupan
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Wes Peters
- /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Will Andrews
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Crist J. Clark
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien