Hi Mark, Am Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 10:19:32PM -0800 schrieb Mark Millard: > I'm not trying to gauge general interest in reading my > posts: it is perfectly normal for appropriate list > material to not be of interest to more than some subset > of folks. Instead I'm after learning if some of my posts > are viewed as inappropriate posting activity --and, if > some are, what about them is inappropriate (what should > not have been posted).
I would appreciate if you ... - would post your threads to only one list at a time, as I usually get your mails two or three times from different lists usually. Decide which list is most appropriate and post there. If people care about ARM, they subscribe to the ARM list. If they don't, they don't. Respect their choice and keep ARM-related stuff on the ARM list so that people who don't care don't get your mails. - Remove all the noise and keep the emails succinct. If they are more than 100 lines I won't read them, as it takes too much time to get the useful bits out from all the extra stuff in them. In particalar, there is no need to post hundreds of lines of command output. - instead open a bugzilla issue with all the details - if you follow up, please only cite the relevant parts of your previous mails. Currently you cite the whole emails and just add some little blurp somewhere, making it extremely annoying to read followups. There is zero need to repeat all the old stuff, we all have your emails saved and can refer to them. Yours, Robert Clausecker -- () ascii ribbon campaign - for an encoding-agnostic world /\ - against html email - against proprietary attachments
