On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:40:35 +0100 Daniele Ricci <[email protected]> said:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:57, Carsten Haitzler <[email protected]> wrote: > > i'd invent a new input method that doesn't violate the patent. take the > > principal and change it so its different enough not to violate. then > > implement that. > > > > They've just released version 1.1 for free (1.0 was 1.50 price). Could > this mean something? :) likely not. well not anything patent related. they are probably not seeing enough users paying so they are trying to gain momentum with "free". a large 3 of users rave how great it is (if it actually is) then it may attract enough people to buy it then... and they raise the price again. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
