Oved Ourfali has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: webadmin: Add option to skip fencing of host if SD is active
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(4 comments)

http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/30195/1/frontend/webadmin/modules/gwt-common/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/ui/common/CommonApplicationConstants.java
File 
frontend/webadmin/modules/gwt-common/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/ui/common/CommonApplicationConstants.java:

Line 1868: 
Line 1869:     @DefaultStringValue("Required Random Number Generator sources:")
Line 1870:     String requiredRngSources();
Line 1871: 
Line 1872:     @DefaultStringValue("Skip fencing of a host with active SD:")
Actually, according to the RFE opened on that, the label should be:

"Disrupt fence request if target host is properly communicating with storage"

Default should be ENABLED
Line 1873:     String skipFencingIfSDActive();


http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/30195/1/frontend/webadmin/modules/uicommonweb/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/ui/uicommonweb/models/clusters/ClusterModel.java
File 
frontend/webadmin/modules/uicommonweb/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/ui/uicommonweb/models/clusters/ClusterModel.java:

Line 1482:         getSkipFencingIfSDActiveEnabled().setIsChangable(supported);
Line 1483:         if (supported) {
Line 1484:             
getSkipFencingIfSDActiveEnabled().setEntity(getEntity().isSkipFencingIfSDActive());
Line 1485:         } else {
Line 1486:             getSkipFencingIfSDActiveEnabled().setEntity(false);
Shouldn't it be setEnabled(false) ? or something similar?
Line 1487:         }
Line 1488:     }
Line 1489: 
Line 1490:     private void populateCPUList(ClusterModel clusterModel, 
List<ServerCpu> cpus, boolean canChangeArchitecture)


http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/30195/1/frontend/webadmin/modules/webadmin/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/ui/webadmin/ApplicationConstants.java
File 
frontend/webadmin/modules/webadmin/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/ui/webadmin/ApplicationConstants.java:

Line 3749: 
Line 3750:     @DefaultStringValue("Save As Pdf")
Line 3751:     String exportToPdf();
Line 3752: 
Line 3753:     @DefaultStringValue("This will skip fencing operations on a Host 
that has active Storage Domains")
So "This will disrupt fence request on a Host that has active Storage Domains"
Line 3754:     String skipFencingIfSDActiveInfo();


http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/30195/1/frontend/webadmin/modules/webadmin/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/ui/webadmin/section/main/view/popup/cluster/ClusterPopupView.java
File 
frontend/webadmin/modules/webadmin/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/ui/webadmin/section/main/view/popup/cluster/ClusterPopupView.java:

Line 689:             public void eventRaised(Event ev, Object sender, 
EventArgs args) {
Line 690:                 if (object.getVersion().getSelectedItem() != null) {
Line 691:                     String clusterVersion = 
object.getVersion().getSelectedItem().getValue();
Line 692:                     fenceSettingsTab.setVisible(
Line 693:                             
AsyncDataProvider.getInstance().isSkipFencingIfSDActiveSupported(clusterVersion)
That's indeed the logic for now.
In the future we might need to check if there is any entry that is enabled.
Line 694:                     );
Line 695:                 }
Line 696:             }
Line 697:         });


-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/30195
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iaecc1662324ce3d3072c9e850fcf8026ccfab0b2
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: ovirt-engine
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Martin Peřina <mper...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Eli Mesika <emes...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Peřina <mper...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Oved Ourfali <oourf...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: automat...@ovirt.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: oVirt Jenkins CI Server
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
_______________________________________________
Engine-patches mailing list
Engine-patches@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-patches

Reply via email to