Alon Bar-Lev has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: 5. [WIP] core: Introducing configuration loader
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(3 comments)

http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/24365/4/backend/manager/modules/extension-manager/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/extensions/mgr/ConfigurationLoader.java
File 
backend/manager/modules/extension-manager/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/extensions/mgr/ConfigurationLoader.java:

Line 79:         return instance;
Line 80:     }
Line 81: 
Line 82: 
Line 83:     public void load(File directory) throws ConfigurationException {
> We can accept two directory parameters, one for the "built in" extensions (
so have another function nested... and call it twice... the interface should 
not expose that.
Line 84:         // Check that the folder that contains the configuration files 
exists:
Line 85:         if (!directory.exists()) {
Line 86:             throw new ConfigurationException(new FileNotFoundException(
Line 87:                     "The directory \"" + directory.getAbsolutePath() + 
"\" containing the configuration files doesn't "


Line 105: 
Line 106:     /**
Line 107:      * Activates the enabled configurations
Line 108:      */
Line 109:     public void activate() {
> So you want this code to be moved to the load method above, after all confi
yes... any reason not to? I mean what is the reason to expose it?
Line 110:         for (ExtensionEntry entry: loadedEntries.values()) {
Line 111:             if (entry.enabled) {
Line 112:                 activatedEntries.put(entry.name, entry);
Line 113:                 List<ExtensionEntry> entries = 
serviceEntries.get(entry.service);


Line 137:                         + "\" already has the name "
Line 138:                         + name);
Line 139:             }
Line 140:             ExtensionEntry entry =
Line 141:                     new ExtensionEntry(file, 
config.getBoolean(ENABLED, true), name, config.getString(SERVICE), config);
> Not sure I understand your comment.
should be:

 ExtensionEntry entry = new ExtensionEntry(file);
 ExtensionEntry existing = loadEntries.get(entry.name);
 if (existing != null) {
     trow new ...
 }
 loadEntries.put(entry.name, entry);
Line 142:             loadedEntries.put(entry.name, entry);
Line 143: 
Line 144:         } catch (IOException exception) {
Line 145:             throw new ConfigurationException(


-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/24365
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I182904177ec088e62b35bde870ec79725fabc4e4
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Project: ovirt-engine
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Yair Zaslavsky <yzasl...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alon Bar-Lev <alo...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Martin Peřina <mper...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yair Zaslavsky <yzasl...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: oVirt Jenkins CI Server
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
_______________________________________________
Engine-patches mailing list
Engine-patches@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-patches

Reply via email to