> From: David Kastrup <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:42:53 +0100 > Cc: [email protected] > > Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> writes: > > >> From: David Kastrup <[email protected]> > >> > >> There also is a difference between invisibility and display properties > >> here: if there is a display property on a letter "x", it is hard to see > >> why several consecutive images should be reordered to be L->R. Of > >> course, one should argue that in the presence of L->R, people should > >> take care to use the right "shadowed" character to match the intended > >> left/rightness of the image. But I think that is not really sane. If > >> we want display property material to have an explicit direction, it > >> should be set with properties, not by some magic derivation from the > >> underlying invisible text. > > > > I don't understand the use-case, and without it this reads like a > > charade (what "x"? which "shadowed" characters? what images?). Please > > show a complete example, then I'll be able to reason about it. > > Just find some JPG file into an Emacs buffer and look at the underlying > presentation.
If you are talking about a display property whose value is an image, then the discussion until now in this thread did not cover that use-case. At least what I wrote did not cover it. I was talking only about display properties whose value is a string. _______________________________________________ emacs-bidi mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-bidi
