Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> writes: >> From: David Kastrup <[email protected]> >> >> There also is a difference between invisibility and display properties >> here: if there is a display property on a letter "x", it is hard to see >> why several consecutive images should be reordered to be L->R. Of >> course, one should argue that in the presence of L->R, people should >> take care to use the right "shadowed" character to match the intended >> left/rightness of the image. But I think that is not really sane. If >> we want display property material to have an explicit direction, it >> should be set with properties, not by some magic derivation from the >> underlying invisible text. > > I don't understand the use-case, and without it this reads like a > charade (what "x"? which "shadowed" characters? what images?). Please > show a complete example, then I'll be able to reason about it.
Just find some JPG file into an Emacs buffer and look at the underlying presentation. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ emacs-bidi mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-bidi
