> From: David Kastrup <[email protected]> > Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:17:35 +0100 > Cc: [email protected] > > > 3*(54)DCBA > > > > which I think is less surprising. > > I disagree, because there is no reason for 5 and 4 to switch their order > anymore.
Well, then we'll have to disagree. > There also is a difference between invisibility and display properties > here: if there is a display property on a letter "x", it is hard to see > why several consecutive images should be reordered to be L->R. Of > course, one should argue that in the presence of L->R, people should > take care to use the right "shadowed" character to match the intended > left/rightness of the image. But I think that is not really sane. If > we want display property material to have an explicit direction, it > should be set with properties, not by some magic derivation from the > underlying invisible text. I don't understand the use-case, and without it this reads like a charade (what "x"? which "shadowed" characters? what images?). Please show a complete example, then I'll be able to reason about it. _______________________________________________ emacs-bidi mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-bidi
