> Here it is.
Looks okay to me.. check it in yourself..
Dave.
>
> Maarten.
>
> On 10/2/07, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You seem to be correct, i must have added the tmp variable in attempt
>> to solve something, that i ended up solving differently.
>>
>> I will redo the patch and send again.
>>
>> Maarten.
>>
>> On 10/2/07, Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Maarten Maathuis wrote:
>>>> Please check the first patch, the second is only to give you an idea
>>>> why i would want this. Only implemented for linux, since i lack a bsd
>>>> system.
>>>>
>>>> Anything wrong with this?
>>>
>>>
>>> I guess I don't understand the need for the extra pdev_tmp variable.
>>> Couldn't you get the same result by just adding the following at the
>>> head of the loop?
>>>
>>> if ((pid->class != 0)
>>> && ((pdev->class & pid->class_mask) != pid->class)) {
>>> continue;
>>> }
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>>>
>>> iD8DBQFHAp6qX1gOwKyEAw8RAvJjAJ0X1M8jcnltRxj0h9sZZx1L2sXi4gCfTHlR
>>> vU+ZkjghLs4x/2Al41Q+DF8=
>>> =eowq
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>
>>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
