Is there anything holding this back?
On 10/2/07, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here it is.
>
> Maarten.
>
> On 10/2/07, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You seem to be correct, i must have added the tmp variable in attempt
> > to solve something, that i ended up solving differently.
> >
> > I will redo the patch and send again.
> >
> > Maarten.
> >
> > On 10/2/07, Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> > > > Please check the first patch, the second is only to give you an idea
> > > > why i would want this. Only implemented for linux, since i lack a bsd
> > > > system.
> > > >
> > > > Anything wrong with this?
> > >
> > >
> > > I guess I don't understand the need for the extra pdev_tmp variable.
> > > Couldn't you get the same result by just adding the following at the
> > > head of the loop?
> > >
> > > if ((pid->class != 0)
> > > && ((pdev->class & pid->class_mask) != pid->class)) {
> > > continue;
> > > }
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
> > >
> > > iD8DBQFHAp6qX1gOwKyEAw8RAvJjAJ0X1M8jcnltRxj0h9sZZx1L2sXi4gCfTHlR
> > > vU+ZkjghLs4x/2Al41Q+DF8=
> > > =eowq
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >
> >
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
