You seem to be correct, i must have added the tmp variable in attempt
to solve something, that i ended up solving differently.

I will redo the patch and send again.

Maarten.

On 10/2/07, Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> > Please check the first patch, the second is only to give you an idea
> > why i would want this. Only implemented for linux, since i lack a bsd
> > system.
> >
> > Anything wrong with this?
>
>
> I guess I don't understand the need for the extra pdev_tmp variable.
> Couldn't you get the same result by just adding the following at the
> head of the loop?
>
>         if ((pid->class != 0)
>                 && ((pdev->class & pid->class_mask) != pid->class)) {
>                 continue;
>         }
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFHAp6qX1gOwKyEAw8RAvJjAJ0X1M8jcnltRxj0h9sZZx1L2sXi4gCfTHlR
> vU+ZkjghLs4x/2Al41Q+DF8=
> =eowq
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to