I am running the latest CVS x.org.
It shows that the highly experimental warning and all of that in the logfile.
I keep thinking that I have fumbled the ball somewhere on the compile and install, but I just can't see it at the moment. I haven't given up yet though. ;-)
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Peter Zubaj wrote:
Did you get latest CVS x.org source with support for r300 ? Or did you patch it with ati.patch from r300_driver ?
D. Hageman wrote:
<
I just got done with the second try at this. I pulled the Mesa and r300_driver cvs trees this morning and recompiled. The only hitch was that apparently some changes have happened to the radeon and r200 driver in the Mesa tree that doesn't allow it to compile. Looks like someone added some code with some defines that didn't get into the header.
At any rate, still the same situation with the glxgears. It works, but it works slow. I don't get any lockups. I think the r300_demo is working fine. Enabling the LIBGL_DEBUG doesn't show that it isn't finding anything like r300_dri.so or something.
//========================================================\\ || D. Hageman <[email protected]> || \\========================================================//
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
