On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Saturday 15 January 2005 13:56, D. Hageman wrote:I just got done with the second try at this. I pulled the Mesa and r300_driver cvs trees this morning and recompiled. The only hitch was that apparently some changes have happened to the radeon and r200 driver in the Mesa tree that doesn't allow it to compile. Looks like someone added some code with some defines that didn't get into the header.
At any rate, still the same situation with the glxgears. It works, but it works slow. I don't get any lockups. I think the r300_demo is working fine. Enabling the LIBGL_DEBUG doesn't show that it isn't finding anything like r300_dri.so or something.
Here is the output from glxgears -info
GL_MAX_VIEWPORT_DIMS=4096/4096 GL_RENDERER = Mesa X11^^^^^^^^
You're using the wrong libGL.
Indeed you are right. I am trying to figure out how it is deciding that. It says in my Xorg.log that Direct Rendering is enabled. It autoloads my kernel drivers and I can see them in lsmod. It just isn't looking for the r300_dri.so.
I really hate trying to work with 3 different source trees. :-(
//========================================================\\ || D. Hageman <[email protected]> || \\========================================================//
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
