Around 21 o'clock on May 24, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9?= Fonseca wrote:
> Keith P., even very recentely it was discussed on the Xpert mailing list > that the XFree86 project didn't have the manpower to handle all the patches > that are being submited regularly. How do you propose that we channel fixes > to the XFree86 CVS? (IMHO: More a reason to have bugzilla, give CVS access > to more people and so on..) I'd like to see DRI development done in the XFree86 repository so that fixes are integrated by the people who understand the code. That way changes could be made incrementally instead of the giant patch method we have today. I'd also like to see XFree86 use bugzilla, but at this point, we don't have the resources to get that running. From experience with other projects, it takes several months of serious pain before bugzilla starts to pay off, and then it still require regular maintenance and management. Getting DRI into XFree86 CVS seems like a relatively low-overhead way to reduce the lag between the two systems, perhaps we can try to restart those discussions. Keith Packard XFree86 Core Team HP Cambridge Research Lab _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
