On 11/10/25 5:37 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> GMU lies on the CX domain and accesses CX GBIF. So do CX GBIF
> configurations before GMU wakes up. This was not a problem so far, but
> A840 GPU is very sensitive to this requirement. Also, move these
> registers to the catalog.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <[email protected]>
> ---

[...]

> +     /* For A7x and newer, do the CX GBIF configurations before GMU wake up 
> */
> +     for (int i = 0; (gbif_cx && gbif_cx[i].offset); i++)
> +             gpu_write(gpu, gbif_cx[i].offset, gbif_cx[i].value);

We haven't been doing this a lot in the GPU driver, but adding a
.num_entries-like field is both more memory efficient and less error-prone

> +
> +     /* For A7x and newer, do the CX GBIF configurations before GMU wake up 
> */

duplicate comment

> +     if (adreno_is_a8xx(adreno_gpu)) {
> +             gpu_write(gpu, REG_A8XX_GBIF_CX_CONFIG, 0x20023000);
> +             gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_MRC_GBIF_QOS_CTRL, 0x33);

Either set this prio value here, or in a8xx_gpu.c

> +     }
> +
>       /* Set up the lowest idle level on the GMU */
>       a6xx_gmu_power_config(gmu);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> index 029f7bd25baf..66771958edb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> @@ -1265,17 +1265,20 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>       /* enable hardware clockgating */
>       a6xx_set_hwcg(gpu, true);
>  
> -     /* VBIF/GBIF start*/
> -     if (adreno_is_a610_family(adreno_gpu) ||
> -         adreno_is_a640_family(adreno_gpu) ||
> -         adreno_is_a650_family(adreno_gpu) ||
> -         adreno_is_a7xx(adreno_gpu)) {
> +     /* For gmuwrapper implementations, do the VBIF/GBIF CX configuration 
> here */
> +     if (adreno_is_a610_family(adreno_gpu)) {
>               gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_QSB_SIDE0, 0x00071620);

a640/650 family GPUs didn't receive a .gbif_cx addition in the catalog to match

>               gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_QSB_SIDE1, 0x00071620);
>               gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_QSB_SIDE2, 0x00071620);
>               gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_QSB_SIDE3, 0x00071620);
> -             gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_CLIENT_QOS_CNTL,
> -                       adreno_is_a7xx(adreno_gpu) ? 0x2120212 : 0x3);
> +     }
> +
> +     if (adreno_is_a610_family(adreno_gpu) ||
> +         adreno_is_a640_family(adreno_gpu) ||
> +         adreno_is_a650_family(adreno_gpu)) {
> +             gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_CLIENT_QOS_CNTL, 0x3);
> +     } else if (adreno_is_a7xx(adreno_gpu)) {
> +             gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_CLIENT_QOS_CNTL, 0x2120212);
>       } else {
>               gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_VBIF_CLIENT_QOS_CNTL, 0x3);

Downstream seems to set QOS_CNTL at the same time as QSB_SIDEn for
these targets


>       }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
> index 031ca0e4b689..cf700f7de09b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct a6xx_info {
>       const struct adreno_protect *protect;
>       const struct adreno_reglist_list *pwrup_reglist;
>       const struct adreno_reglist_list *ifpc_reglist;
> +     const struct adreno_reglist *gbif_cx;
>       const struct adreno_reglist_pipe *nonctxt_reglist;
>       u32 gmu_chipid;
>       u32 gmu_cgc_mode;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a8xx_gpu.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a8xx_gpu.c
> index 2ef69161f1d0..ad140b0d641d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a8xx_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a8xx_gpu.c
> @@ -500,6 +500,9 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>  
>       gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_SECVID_TSB_CNTL, 0);
>  
> +     /* Increase priority of GMU traffic over GPU traffic */
> +     gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_MRC_GBIF_QOS_CTRL, 0x33);

Kgsl (later) added this for A740 too - would it be beneficial to enable
unconditionally on gen7+?

Konrad

Reply via email to