On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 6:10 PM Christian König
<[email protected]> wrote:
>[...]
> In this particular use case we actually don't want the percpu wq.
>
> This can execute on any CPU except for the current one.
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> > exit:
> > if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) {
>
Hi Christian,
like for the unbound workqueue also the system_percpu_wq is just a
rename for system_wq.
Technically I changed the workqueue because we added in the code two wq:
- system_percpu_wq
- system_dfl_wq
You can see the commits mentioned in the cover letter, shared also below:
- commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
- commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
So basically the behavior is the same.
But if it would be beneficial to have an unbound wq, I can send the v2
with the change!
We did so also for other subsystems.
Thanks!
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product
