On 10/31/25 09:42, Marco Crivellari wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 6:14 PM Christian König > <[email protected]> wrote: >> [...] >> In all the cases below we actually want the work to run on a different CPU >> than the current one. >> >> So using system_unbound_wq seems to be more appropriate. > > Hello Christian, > > system_dfl_wq is the new workqueue that will replace > system_unbound_wq, but the behavior is the same. > So, if you need system_unbound_wq, it means system_dfl_wq is fine here.
Ah, ok thanks! In that case I'm fine with the change. It sounded like system_dfl_wq is the new per CPU wq. Regards, Christian. > > Thanks!
