On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 6:14 PM Christian König <[email protected]> wrote: >[...] > In all the cases below we actually want the work to run on a different CPU > than the current one. > > So using system_unbound_wq seems to be more appropriate.
Hello Christian, system_dfl_wq is the new workqueue that will replace system_unbound_wq, but the behavior is the same. So, if you need system_unbound_wq, it means system_dfl_wq is fine here. Thanks! -- Marco Crivellari L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product
