Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > As document author, this seems like a good time for updating RFC 9364 > to add important DNSSEC RFCs from the past few years. The IETF still > doesn't have a good way, other than an RFC, to tell people "here is a > definitive description of what the $foo protocol means" if the protocol
Yes. :-(
> FWIW, I have started to see more non-IETF documents refer to RFC 9364
> (instead of 4033-4035) when they first mention "DNSSEC", so we do know
> it is useful. This call for adoption is about whether we want to keep
> this useful thing somewhat up-to-date.
Yes, I agree. Let's do this.
I've read the diffs against RFC9364, and they seem minor (other than the
references). Are there further things that you expect this document to do?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
