Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
    > As document author, this seems like a good time for updating RFC 9364
    > to add important DNSSEC RFCs from the past few years. The IETF still
    > doesn't have a good way, other than an RFC, to tell people "here is a
    > definitive description of what the $foo protocol means" if the protocol

Yes. :-(

    > FWIW, I have started to see more non-IETF documents refer to RFC 9364
    > (instead of 4033-4035) when they first mention "DNSSEC", so we do know
    > it is useful. This call for adoption is about whether we want to keep
    > this useful thing somewhat up-to-date.

Yes, I agree. Let's do this.

I've read the diffs against RFC9364, and they seem minor (other than the
references).  Are there further things that you expect this document to do?

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to