As document author, this seems like a good time for updating RFC 9364 to add important DNSSEC RFCs from the past few years. The IETF still doesn't have a good way, other than an RFC, to tell people "here is a definitive description of what the $foo protocol means" if the protocol is spread over more than two or three RFCs. This WG cares a lot about DNSSEC and good DNSSEC operations, so it feels like we should help others with understanding that.
FWIW, I have started to see more non-IETF documents refer to RFC 9364 (instead of 4033-4035) when they first mention "DNSSEC", so we do know it is useful. This call for adoption is about whether we want to keep this useful thing somewhat up-to-date. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
