On Thu, Jan 15, 2026, at 05:51, Libor Peltan wrote: > I think that you are motivated by the scale how the broken clients are > wide-spread, and how crippled upgrade policies prevent upgrading them in > reasonable time. However, writing and publishing an RFC also doesn't > happen in a short time.
Also, if these clients are broken and cannot be upgraded, they can be reconfigured to point to an intermediary resolver which can be configured to provide them the results in the order they are required. The requirement to provide results in a specific order does not mean that every publicly available resolver must work that way. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
