Hey, On 17 Jan 2026, at 03:59, Ángel <[email protected]> wrote:
> My first comment to the draft is that we should add a reference to CVE- > 2002-0400 as a relevant precedent. Thank you, we will do that. > Second, regarding the current wording of the draft, I am against the > way it is phrased. When it states: >> the section MUST be treated as an ordered list of RRSets > > [...] > > However, I am in favor of adding a text such as the following: > > [...] I quite like your formulation, and I think I agree that it's better than what we suggested initially. Thanks for taking the time to write that up. I think based on other comments consensus was already tilted towards making more tightly-scoped advice around CNAME and DNAME and being more explicit about not changing the packaging of DNSSEC RRs, and your text does this quite elegantly. I am interested to hear whether anybody else thinks differently. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
