> On Dec 19, 2025, at 17:42, StJohns, Michael <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This appears to cover the current policies for the .US domain: > https://www.ntia.gov/files/ntia/publications/technical_proposal_volume_1.pdf > > The .US domain was delegated to USDOC/Ntia and it appears that Neustar > provides the registry services under contract. > > The document in question ceased to operate as policy many many years ago and > may safely be designated Historic > > To respond directly to John - what would cause confusion is if someone > thought 1480 was live and, where 1480 differed from current policy, tried to > argue for the old interpretation. Let’s not. > > Historic and move on
I agree. It is clear the IETF doesn’t dictate policy for .us so marking the document historic would send the proper signal for that. And would stop any further people from creating errata which, whether correct or not, are distracting and useless work. Paul
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
