RFC8482 ==> any DNS resolver or authoritative server can return anything they like HINFO. Like you I think of ANY query as GQGO (Garbage Query == Garbage Output)
Olafur > On Nov 26, 2025, at 23:30, Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Roy and co-authors, > > In a discussion elsewhere a point was taken what to do with ANY queries that > match the DS and the new extra types. Should the types in this draft be > returned only when specifically asked for or should they (a one of them) be > returned for ANY query. > > And if DS and DELEG match the ANY query at the parent, should the proof of > non-existence also match the ANY query? > > My view is that ANY is garbage, so returning DS/DELEG or NSEC is perfectly > fine, but this probably needs to be specified. It is also a perfect time to > specify this because of the new types at parent. > > Ondrej > -- > Ondřej Surý (He/Him) > >> On 20. 10. 2025, at 21:40, Roy Arends <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Dear DNSOP WG, >> >> First presented at the DD WG, I've now re-submitted the latest version of >> Delegation Extensions (including minor updates) to the datatracker with a >> new title to reflect "DNSOP". In short: draft-arends-dnsop-delext-00.txt >> replaces draft-ppr-dd-auth-delegation-types >> >> The motivation for moving this to DNSOP was requested by the DELEG WG chairs >> at the instruction of our INT AD and welcomed by the DNSOP WG chairs, as it >> was thought that the scope of this draft is wider than DELEG. >> >> Warmly >> >> Roy Arends >> >> httpx://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arends-dnsop-delext/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
