Philip Homburg <[email protected]> writes: > >The IESG review caused a lot of text changes due to clarifications that > >the IESG members wanted. Yes, much of the text did indeed change but > >the authors believed the intent was unchanged at least. > > Maybe the authors can explain what the text about DS processing means.
It came from this PR from Tim: https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1/pull/11/files Which was done in order to make the sha1 draft match the gost draft's wording. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
